Batch Analyze 20 Sites at Once: The Network Operator's Audit Tool

Managing one site is straightforward. Managing 16 or 20 sites means keeping track of SEO signals, hosting configurations, schema markup, and accessibility standards across every domain — simultaneously. Manual auditing does not scale. You need a tool that can scan your entire network in a single pass and tell you exactly where each site stands.

The Batch Compare tool was built for this. Enter up to 20 URLs, run the analysis, and get a side-by-side comparison across 10 scoring categories. The output is a matrix showing every site's strengths and gaps in one view.

Import Your Network URLs

You are not typing 20 URLs by hand every time you run an audit. The Batch Analyzer supports CSV and JSON import, which means you build your URL list once and reuse it.

CSV format — one URL per line, or a single column with a header:

url
https://the100dollarnetwork.com
https://the97dollarlaunch.com
https://the20dollaragency.com
https://jwatte.com

JSON format — an array of URL strings or objects:

{
  "urls": [
    "https://the100dollarnetwork.com",
    "https://the97dollarlaunch.com",
    "https://the20dollaragency.com",
    "https://jwatte.com"
  ]
}

Click the import button, select your file, and all 20 URLs populate the input fields. Save the file somewhere you will not lose it — you will run this audit monthly.

The 10 Scoring Categories

Each URL is scored across 10 categories. Understanding what each one checks helps you prioritize fixes.

SEO (Traditional) — Title tags, meta descriptions, heading hierarchy, keyword density, canonical tags, and Open Graph metadata. The basics that still account for the majority of organic traffic.

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) — Presence of llms.txt, agent-card.json, ai-plugin.json, and Speakable schema. These signals determine whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini cite your content.

AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) — FAQ schema, HowTo schema, direct answer formatting, and question-based headings. Targets featured snippets and AI answer boxes.

Schema — Structured data implementation across all applicable types: Organization, Article, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, HowTo, Product, and site-specific schemas.

E-E-A-T — Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness signals. Author pages, bylines, credentials, citations, and trust indicators that Google's quality raters evaluate.

Links — Internal linking structure, broken links, external link quality, anchor text distribution, and cross-domain linking patterns within your network.

Social — Open Graph tags, Twitter Card markup, social sharing metadata, and platform-specific optimization for Facebook, LinkedIn, and X.

Accessibility (A11y) — Alt text coverage, heading structure, color contrast indicators, ARIA labels, and keyboard navigation signals. Accessibility is both a ranking factor and a legal requirement.

Hosting — Canonical configuration, sitemap domain consistency, robots.txt validation, SSL status, redirect chain health, and DNS configuration. This is where network-wide problems surface.

Overall — Weighted composite score across all nine categories.

How the Hosting Score Catches Network-Wide Issues

The Hosting category is the most valuable for network operators. Individual site audits rarely catch the configuration mismatches that break indexing across multiple domains.

Common issues the Hosting score detects:

Canonical mismatches — Your page's canonical tag points to a different domain than the one serving the content. This happens frequently in monoclone networks where a template was cloned but the canonical base URL was not updated.

<!-- Page served from: https://the20dollaragency.com/chapter-1/ -->
<!-- But canonical says: -->
<link rel="canonical" href="https://the97dollarlaunch.com/chapter-1/" />

One misconfigured canonical tag tells Google to ignore your page entirely and credit the other domain.

Sitemap domain conflicts — Your sitemap.xml lists URLs on a domain different from the one hosting the sitemap. This is another monoclone artifact where the sitemap generation pulls from the wrong environment variable.

<!-- Sitemap hosted at: https://site-a.com/sitemap.xml -->
<!-- But contains: -->
<url>
  <loc>https://site-b.com/chapter-1/</loc>
</url>

Robots.txt issues — A misconfigured robots.txt that blocks crawlers from critical paths, or one that references sitemaps on the wrong domain.

When you run the Batch Analyzer across all 20 network sites, these issues light up red in the comparison matrix. One glance tells you which sites have hosting configuration problems.

Comparing Your Network Sites Against Each Other

The primary use case is entering all your own domains and running a comparative audit. The output matrix lets you answer specific questions:

• Which site in my network has the lowest SEO score, and what is it missing?
• Are all 20 sites consistent on GEO signals, or did I deploy llms.txt to some and not others?
• Which sites have schema gaps that the rest of the network already covers?

Because network sites share a monoclone template, most scores should be similar. Large discrepancies between sites in the same network indicate a deployment issue — a site that did not receive a template update, an environment variable that was never set, or a config file that was overwritten during a merge.

Comparing Against Competitors

The Batch Analyzer includes pre-loaded niche sets — groups of competitor URLs in common content verticals. Select a niche set, and those URLs are added to your batch alongside your own sites.

This tells you where your network stands relative to established competitors. If every competitor has FAQ schema and your sites do not, that is a template fix you can deploy network-wide. If your GEO scores exceed the competition, you have a first-mover advantage in AI search visibility.

You can also enter competitor URLs manually. Mix your 16 network sites with 4 competitor sites for a 20-URL batch that gives you both internal consistency and competitive positioning in one scan.

Exporting Results as CSV

Every batch analysis can be exported as CSV. The export includes every URL, every category score, and every individual check result. Open it in a spreadsheet and you have a complete audit record.

URL,SEO,GEO,AEO,Schema,EEAT,Links,Social,A11y,Hosting,Overall
the100dollarnetwork.com,87,92,78,85,80,73,90,82,95,85
the97dollarlaunch.com,85,90,75,83,78,70,88,80,93,83

Run the export monthly. Store each CSV with a date stamp. Over time you build a trend dataset that shows whether your network scores are improving or degrading after template changes.

Using Skill Levels

The Batch Analyzer offers skill level modes. The default mode shows core scores and actionable recommendations. Advanced mode — designed for network operators — exposes the full signal matrix, individual check results, and raw scoring weights.

If you are managing a multi-site network, use advanced mode. The additional detail helps you diagnose whether a low score comes from a missing signal (easy fix) or a structural issue (template redesign).

Where to Go Next

The Batch Analyzer tells you what is broken. The next step is fixing it.

The $97 Launch covers initial site setup — the foundational configuration that prevents hosting and canonical issues from appearing in the first place. If your Hosting scores are low, start there.

The $20 Dollar Agency covers per-site optimization — the SEO, schema, and content strategies that raise individual category scores after the foundation is solid.

Run the audit now at jwatte.com/tools/batch-analyzer/. Enter your network domains, export the results, and start fixing the gaps. The audit takes about a minute per site. The fixes — once you know what is missing — are mostly template-level changes that propagate across your entire network in a single deploy.